Three Essential Considerations Before Signing a Construction Contract in Kuwait

Construction contracts are among the most widely used agreements in Kuwait, owing to rapid urban growth and the increasing number of real estate and commercial projects. Despite their prevalence, many project owners enter into these contracts without a full appreciation of the legal and technical dimensions that govern them. This often results in disputes with contractors, which are typically lengthy, costly, and disruptive to project completion, This article highlights three key issues that every project owner should carefully consider before signing a construction contract in Kuwait.

1. Verifying the Contractor’s Legal Capacity and Workforce Competence

One of the most common mistakes made by project owners is engaging an unlicensed contractor or an individual lacking proper legal status. This practice entails significant risks, such as:

  • Weak legal protection – An unlicensed contract may be rendered voidable for violating the principle of legality, making enforcement against the contractor difficult.
  • Absence of accountability – An unlicensed contractor may default or abandon the project without effective legal recourse available to the employer.
  • Liability for accidents – In the event of workplace accidents or injuries, the employer may be held civilly and even criminally liable if the contractor lacks proper licensing or qualifications.
عقد المقاولة الانشائية

2. Defining Execution Timeframes and Supervision Mechanisms

  • The risks of ambiguity in project duration
    Time is often the most critical factor in construction projects. Many disputes arise because contracts either omit or vaguely define the execution period. Without a clear provision, employers face difficulties in claiming damages for delays.

    Essential contractual provisions include:

    • Fixed duration – The contract should expressly state the start date, completion date, and delivery deadline, binding on both parties.
    • Phased schedule – Divide the project into stages (e.g., foundations, structural works, finishing) with specific timelines for each stage.
    • Technical supervision – Appoint an independent supervisor or consulting engineer to monitor progress, issue reports, and safeguard the employer’s interests.

3. Structuring Payments Under the Contract

Risks of advance payment
One recurring mistake is paying the contractor the full contract price upfront, either to obtain a discount or due to lack of awareness of the risks. If the contractor halts performance or withdraws from the project, recovering the funds becomes a protracted and costly legal process.

Best practices in structuring payments:

  • Installments linked to progress – Payments should be tied to specific project milestones.
  • Final payment – Withheld until full completion and compliance with specifications are confirmed.
  • Retention – Withhold 5–10% of the contract value, payable after a defined period following handover, to ensure quality and remedy any defects.

Broader Legal Considerations

In addition to these three pillars, other essential contractual aspects include:

  • Scope of work – Clearly define the scope with annexed drawings and technical specifications.
  • Dispute resolution – Agree on a mechanism, whether arbitration or litigation, to resolve potential disputes.
  • Change orders – Regulate variations during execution, specifying the impact on both cost and time.

When addressed comprehensively, these provisions reduce the likelihood of disputes and strengthen the contract’s enforceability.

Conclusion

A construction contract is the legal backbone of any development project. It is not merely an agreement to perform work for consideration but a comprehensive legal instrument that protects the interests of both the employer and the contractor.

By: verifying the contractor’s licensing and competence, defining execution periods with precision, and structuring payments around project progress, employers can greatly minimize the risk of disputes and ensure projects are delivered within budget and timeframe.

Given the high costs of construction, prevention is always preferable to litigation. The most effective safeguard is the involvement of a specialized lawyer before signing the contract. Robust legal drafting and